From being something of a mystery fish ten years ago, to the stage where
it's only a matter of time before the thousand pound barrier is broken,
blue marlin have revolutionised lure trolling and indeed our approaches
to game fishing in this country like no other species. Chris Hall explains
how it's come about.
Page One | Page Two | Page Three| Page Four
We had just tagged and released Bob Donnelly's third blue marlin for
the day, a fish of around 220kg. After the congratulatory back slapping
and hand shaking had subsided, we calculated the total weight of marlin
'Cintra' had released during her five days of fishing the Port Stephens
canyons to about a skipjack over 1200kg. With the exception of one black,
all our fish were the bigger and faster blues we had come here to catch.
For 'Cintra' at least, blue marlin are the ultimate game fish in our waters
and thus our entire fishing effort is devoted to them.
|
| Ian Miller battling it out on stand-up 37kg tackle. |
Fishing the deepwater canyons and sea mounts from Sydney to Port Stephens,
'Cintra' is a very fast 41' Steber set up for serious heavy tackle marlin
fishing. She does not carry gaffs, but instead an intricate work of art
by Ian Miller in the form of a custom tag pole and the latest Nikon stills
and Sony video cameras. The crew of 'Cintra' comprises four experienced
members - Bill Robinson, skipper, Bob Donnelly, angler, Ian Miller, angler,
and myself on the deck. In addition to 'the crew', 'Cintra' frequently
carries one or more guest anglers who invariably have little or no fishing
experience.
The heavy tackle system we have developed provides us with a capture
rate of 66% of all marlin we encounter regardless of species or size,
and gives us a current average of 1.625 marlin captures per fishing day.
During our 1991 season, however, we encountered more blue marlin and
less striped marlin than usual, resulting in our capturing more fish over
150kg and less fish under 100kg. This factor increased our capture rate
to 82% of all marlin we encountered and 100% of all blue marlin we encountered.
As these statistics would indicate, our system is designed for big marlin
and whilst it still returns us 50% of their smaller striped cousins, they
are simply not our priority!
With this in mind, our standard trolling tackle for blue marlin comprises
four Ian Miller ' Broadbill' chair rods fitted with Fin Nor 12/0 Tri Gear
reels spooled with 60kg Amilan monofilament. Occasionally to accommodate
specific anglers, e.g. ladies, 37kg chair outfits are used. And, from
time to time Ian likes to tackle big fish using stand up 37kg Shortstrokers,
but generally four 130s are the order of the day. This choice of tackle
provides our anglers with every possible fish fighting advantage and our
preference for mono over dacron provides our guest anglers with a slight
margin for error.
The more complex factor in our tackle equation is our choice of trolling
lures and the way we have chosen to rig them. Firstly, 'Cintra' does not
simply troll lures; she trolls a 'pattern' of four lures, which has taken
a decade to evolve its present form. The evolution of our pattern can
be best explained by simply telling it the way it is or was in this instance.
Prior to the launch of 'Cintra' in 1989, I had spent five memorable years
running the cockpit for Joe Ritchie on his 41'Steber Jay Ah'. Back in
these early days, now 'the good ol' days', most Sydney crews considered
blue marlin as a figment of someone else's imagination, I kid you not!
And that is pretty much the way it remained until trolling Hawaiian lures
jay Ah' proved firstly that blue marlin could be regularly caught off
Sydney, and secondly that you could actually catch two blue marlin in
one day... if you really tried! Anyway, the lures we used to catch many
great blues on jay Ah' back then are the same lures that form the basis
of the lure pattern we run on 'Cintra' today.
|
(Top to bottom)
Joe Yee Apollo 'Evil'
Joe Yee 501 'Grimace'
Marlin Magic large tube 'Slash'
straight-sided plunger 'Big Dog' |
'Cintra's' pattern is made up of four original Hawaiian lures. The first
is a Joe Yee Apollo called 'Evil', that runs in the long 'rigger position
and has so far caught us 50 marlin including many of our largest blues.
The original Evil has, over the years, caught so many blue marlin for
so many boats that he's been copied and bastardised by every would be
lure maker you can imagine. There is only one 'Evil'! Joe Ritchie and
myself named him Evil after taking eight marlin shots in a single day
on 'JayAh'. He is an original Joe Yee Apollo and a truly great trolling
lure; so don't let the copy mongers sell you a lemon!
Our second Joe Yee is a 501 called 'Grimace.' He has caught us 24 marlin
from the short corner and is the same lure used on 'Aspro' to capture
their 317kg blue marlin that holds the current Australian All Tackle record.
The remaining half of our pattern is made up of two Marlin Magic lures.
A heavily loaded Tube called 'Slash' which, depending on the weather,
alternates between the short rigger and long corner positions. Slash is
also the lure used on Thee Sheriff to catch their 284kg blue marlin that
won them $20,000 in prize money back in 1990. This blue was the largest
marlin caught out of Sydney at that time.
Continued...
Our other Marlin Magic is a large Straight sided plunger called 'Big
Dog'. He runs in whichever position is left vacant when alternating with
the Tube. He has no specific claim to fame at this point, other than he
catches many marlin for 'Cintra' (including two of the three fish mentioned
at the beginning of this article) and has 1000 pound blue marlin written
all over him. I guess only time will tell for Big Dog!
There is one other important point I should make about our trolling pattern.
We troll a Pakula Witchdoctor Mirror Teaser from the long corner. I believe
the Witchdoctor plays a major role in drawing marlin into our transom
and so consider it an integral part of the pattern.
Whilst the performance characteristics required in a trolling lure are
quite specific, I will accept there are odd times when ma eat anything
you care to throw over the transom a fact evident the number of lures
out there don't ever catch their second marlin. (Mind you, there are even
more trolling lures out there which wont ever catch their first marlin.)
The four Hawaiian lures we troll on 'Cintra ', however, have had to earn
and then maintain their position within our pattern 'by consistently catching
fish.
|
| 'Explosive' is probably the best way to describe Blue Marlin. |
This selection process takes time (years, in fact) and is directly comparable
to the way a batman earns his place in a test side, consistently scoring
more runs than the next guy. The knowledge acquired during this lengthy
period is, in my view, one of the most important assets a lure fisherman
can possess. Having seen our lures eaten by marlin several hundred times
now, I have a fair idea of the way they must perform in order for them
to be eaten again. I am also satisfied that each of our lures maximises
our return from the trolling position it occupies, and that together as
a pattern they provide the best combination of lure actions, sizes and
colours for our purpose, Yes, yes I know... marlin don't see colours!
I guess if the little fellows who run around cutting up marlins' eyeballs
tell us they don't see colours, then they probably don't! At least not
the way we see colours. On the other hand, many marlin have convinced
me that colours are important.
In my experience there are three visual elements of colour that are commonly
recognised by marlin. They are therefore the basis of colour in our trolling
pattern. The first is black or permanent shadow. The second is flash,
as in silver or chrome, and the third is brightness as in neon or fluoro.
I am also convinced that these three elements are at their most effective
when used in combination to produce a baitfish likeness.
A lure possessing just one of these elements will catch marlin. Grimace,
for example, is just pale blue over fluoro green. Whilst I'm sure marlin
don't see Grimace as green, they certainly recognise that he is 'lit up'
like neon. Whether he's green neon, pink neon or purple neon, I'm certain
doesn't matter. What seems important to the fish is simply that he's 'lit
up'. Slash possesses two of the three elements with a dark blue/green
top over a gold belly with a fluoro chartreuse inner. These colours were
the best I could find in my attempt to simulate a small yellowfin tuna.
Evil has Xmas tree colours, with the element of flash giving him a baitfish
likeness, and Big Dog is big and black over metallic pale blue with a
baitfish likeness also.
Now, whether or not these lures look like baitfish to you or I when they're
lying on the deck really doesn't interest me. What does interest me, however,
is this. Evil is always the dominant lure in our pattern when we are working
schools of skipjacks, taking 9 of our 13 marlin during our last trip for
example. So, from the marlin's point of view at least, Evil and skipjacks
have something in common. This situation changes somewhat when the skipjacks
are thick with yellowfin. Evil still takes his share of fish due to the
presence of the skipjacks, but has to share the shots with Slash. A further,
more dramatic change occurs when the bait schools contain only yellowfin.
Slash becomes completely dominant, taking all of our bigger blues under
these conditions.
|
| The double hook cable rigs used in 'Cintra's'
lures contradict the popular assumption that opposing hooks provide
the best hook-up rate. |
I am not suggesting that these lures in themselves look exactly like
skipjacks or yellowfin. What I am saying is that when marlin are feeding
on skipjacks the overall image or presentation of Evil through the water
is recognisable and totally acceptable to every marlin that sees him.
The same level of acceptability applies to Slash when marlin are feeding
on yellowfin. For similar reasons, Big Dog has taken every blue we've
caught whilst trolling a 'sun run' during the late afternoon. Under these
intense light conditions the marlin find Big Dog's image more commonly
recognisable and therefore more readily acceptable than the other lures
in our pattern.
At the other end of the spectrum, the neon appearance of Grimace is at
its most productive during periods of bad light. So, accepting that fish
don't necessarily see colours the way we do, you don't have to be a rocket
scientist to work out that colours are still important. If they weren't
important, 'Cintra's' lure pattern would consist of four Evils'.
Continued...
There are two other factors that contribute to the strike rates of the
lures within our pattern. Size is important insofar as it maintains the
recognisable image we present to the marlin, and then there's action.
Action is critical! Keeping in mind that our lures swim in specific positions,
Evil from the long rigger and Grimace from the short corner, they individually
possess swimming actions also commonly recognised by marlin. Slash swims
like a feeding tuna whilst the others appear like baitfish trying to escape
a predator. The importance of these very active swimming styles is they
never, and I stress never, fail to induce the strike.
|
| Incidental captures like this tail-walking striped
marlin are ideal pratice while waiting for the 'real' fish to turn
up. |
Blue marlin, with few exceptions, will always 'eyeball' or attempt
to 'freak out' a trolling lure before crashing it. At these times, the
action or more specifically 'apparent reaction' of the lure to the marlin's
presence is critical to its strike rate. During the few seconds it takes
a marlin to 'eyeball' the lure, the lure's colour, size and action must
work together to present an immediately recognisable and therefore acceptable,
reaction to the fish in order to guarantee the strike. For my money,
its a lure's ability to continually present this 'reaction' that largely
determines a great trolling lure from a piece of junk. A good example
of what I'm on about here is demonstrated every time an angler finds
it necessary to crank a lure away from a marlin to induce the strike.
The angler has added 'reaction' to the otherwise poor presentation of
his lure. My point here is, continual, reaction is an inherent design
feature of the Hawaiian lures in our trolling pattern.
The best lure design will still only rate as average, however, if its
action is later compromised during the rigging process. Therefore, MY
first objective when rigging a lure is to further enhance its swimming
action with perfect balance. I cannot over emphasise the importance of
balancing the hooks to swim within the original action of the lure.
The rigs I run in our lures all feature two 12/0 hooks swaged and set
at zero degrees on 645lb stainless cable. In other words, both hooks are
rigged in line. The trailing hook is always fixed (not swinging) and both
hooks are kept in line at zero degrees by whipping the leading hook to
the cable with waxed nylon thread. This is done specifically so that both
hooks act and swim as one. Rigs for Evil and Slash comprise two Mustad
7691S hooks, whilst the larger head diameters of Grimace and Big Dog require
a 7732 followed by a 7691S.
Our leaders are 20 feet of 5001b jinkai, protected at the contact points
by hard nylon leader skins. Once rigged, the lure is fixed into position
on the leader with the aid of a single softwood toothpick. This way the
lure will now run continually in its upright position with both hooks
riding vertically up through its back.
Whilst on the subject of hooks, I should explain that we do not use hooks
prepared with traditional diamond points. I prefer to sharpen then polish
our hooks so that the cutting edges leading from the point to the barb
are completely eliminated and the height of the barb is reduced. The result
is a stronger, round needlepoint with a slippery smooth, even taper extending
to the back of the barb. This, in turn, allows the hook to completely
bury itself by puncturing the fish, as opposed to cutting an incision
in the fish.
Rigging all four lures in the manner I have described provides us with
considerable advantages over more traditional methods. The most obvious
of these is superior presentation, for our lures swim with the natural
actions of baitfish. And equally important is control over the positions
of our hook points during the strike. In 90% of cases the first contact
our hook points make with the fish is up against the roof of its mouth.
Continued...
So, when our lures eventually hit the water most of the really hard
work is already done and our usual scenario goes something like this...
The skipper will mark a fish on the sounder as deep as 40 fathoms below
the surface in some cases and commence trolling a tight grid over it.
Each pass over the fish will see it appear a little closer to the surface
30 fathoms, 20 fathoms and so on. Raising the fish in this manner may
take some time as much as an hour or more during which optimum lure
presentation is intensely controlled by the crew. Once the fish is up
and approaching the pattern, it is invariably observed from the bridge
as, it, eyeballs' a lure. It will then drop back and charge in for the
strike.
Without underestimating the importance of lure presentation in commanding
the strike, it also just as importantly determines the quality of the
strike. The marlin, having just recognised the 'reaction' of the lure
at close range will now eat it with the same skill and lethal efficiency
it uses to eat a baitfish! I'm not talking a tap on the head with the
bill and a half hearted peck on the cheek, here. I'm talking major 'lunch
on it', 'suck it down its throat', 'eat it big time'. I'm talking the
kind of strike a high hook-up rate is built on.
Hooking marlin under these circumstances is really not difficult, requiring
only strong hook points and good timing. As soon as the weight of the
fish is felt and the FinNor begins to scream (15 kilos of drag), the
hooks which are already partly (I stress partly) in the fish are then
buried by gunning the boat. This results in 80% of our captures being
double hooked up through the roof of the mouth and 20% through the underside
of the bill. Remembering that 'Cintra' often carries inexperienced anglers,
our hook up efficiency plays an important role in maintaining our capture
rate.
Once our hook rig is buried in the fish it cannot be shaken free during
the fight In most cases the crew's removal of either hook after tagging
the marlin is impossible without first severing the cable which holds
them together. The reason for this is that each hook effectively locks
the other in the fish and the pressure exerted by the angler and equipment
during the fight can only rotate the leading hook. The trailing hook never
moves and acts as an anchor to ensure the leading hook cannot be pulled
out of the fish.
During our years of fishing this system on 'Cintra' we have never had
a marlin enter the pattern and then leave it without striking a lure,
and we have only ever once pulled the hooks whilst fighting a fish. Once
we have the fish in our pattern one of our four lures will always command
the strike and once we hook the fish (with the one exception I've mentioned)
the fish is ours. A minor problem with our system is that removing hooks
is difficult, and at times quite dangerous. This is a problem I'm confident
we have resolved with a customised long handled cable cutter. The only
other problem is our 50% hook up rate on striped marlin. This problem
is, I believe, best resolved with medium tackle and eight inch lures rigged
with double 10/0 hooks. Its a solution which is, unfortunately, not conducive
to consistently high capture rates of blue marlin. There are, of course,
many other lure trolling systems used for blue marlin both here in Australia
and abroad with varying degrees of efficiency. I have purposely avoided
comparing their positive and negative aspects here because I simply do
not believe in them. On the other hand, 'Cintra's' system works, so if
you think you can benefit from it, use it! To those of you who do ultimately
catch more marlin using our system, I ask you to at least consider releasing
the fish, for every marlin should be entitled to at least one honest mistake!
Think about it!
FOOTNOTE: Our local waters from Sydney to Port Stephens have often
produced two and three blue marlin per day in the 150-250kg range. During
our relatively short season from January through April, blues of this
size and larger can be found over the deep water canyons and sea mounts
which lay just beyond the shelf With water temperatures at 23'C or better,
schools of skipjacks and small yellowfin tuna found in these areas invariably
concentrate good numbers of blue marlin.
Page One | Page Two | Page Three | Page Four
|